11/13/2022 0 Comments Double dragon 2 nes overscanNot based on actual numbers, but simply because CRTs, by their very nature, tend to smooth over imperfections in video, while LCDs and other digital displays only magnify flaws. I've always been a proponent of CRTs, but lately I've doubled down even harder on them being superior. >Generally speaking I think most games that were designed to display on CRTs look better on CRTs Heavy metals are used in CRT glass to reduce radiation Analog signals limit a CRT's resolutions and refresh rates and negatively effect picture quality CRTs can be permanently damaged by nearby magnets CRTs have severe reflections because they do not have matte coats CRTs should not be used because they are heavier and deeper than LCDs Curved CRTs have objectively inferior picture quality versus flat CRTs with otherwise equal specifications The Sony GDM-FW900 is the only CRT worth owning 4:3 is so bad that nobody should use a non-widescreen CRT Sending an improper mode (resolution or refresh rate) to a CRT can cause permanent damage Afterimages caused by phosphor decay are extremely annoying and are a significant downside of CRTs Analog CRTs have more processing time than digital LCDs due to poor RAMDAC performance Overall CRT black levels are not superior to LCDs because ambient light ruins CRT black levels CRTs need calibration more than two to three times a year CRTs contain lethal amounts of electricity, even when unplugged CRTs always make a high-pitched squealing noise CRTs always have easily-visible flicker CRTs emit dangerous levels of X-rays or other forms of radiation CRTs are no longer produced because they have inferior picture quality versus LCDs
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |